Changes in Therapy and Outcome of Patients Requiring Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO) is related with poor outcome, especially in Germany. We aimed to analyze whether changes in vv-ECMO therapy during the pandemic were observed and lead to changes in the outcome of vv-ECMO patients. METHODS: All patients undergoing vv-ECMO support for COVID-19 between 2020 and 2021 in a single center (n = 75) were retrospectively analyzed. Weaning from vv-ECMO and in-hospital mortality were defined as primary and peri-interventional adverse events as secondary endpoints of the study. RESULTS: During the study period, four infective waves were observed in Germany. Patients were assigned correspondingly to four study groups: ECMO implantation between March 2020 and September 2020: first wave (n = 11); October 2020 to February 2021: second wave (n = 23); March 2021 to July 2021: third wave (n = 25); and August 2021 to December 2021: fourth wave (n = 20). Preferred cannulation technique changed within the second wave from femoro-femoral to femoro-jugular access (p < 0.01) and awake ECMO was implemented. Mean ECMO run time increased by more than 300% from 10.9 ± 9.6 (first wave) to 44.9 ± 47.0 days (fourth wave). Weaning of patients was achieved in less than 20% in the first wave but increased to approximately 40% since the second one. Furthermore, we observed a continuous numerically decrease of in-hospital mortality from 81.8 to 57.9% (p = 0.61). CONCLUSION: Preference for femoro-jugular cannulation and awake ECMO combined with preexisting expertise and patient selection are considered to be associated with increased duration of ECMO support and numerically improved ECMO weaning and in-hospital mortality.

Transplantation of hearts from SARS-CoV-2 positive donors.

Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 remains high in the population. Consequently, an increasing percentage of reported organ donors are also SARS-CoV-2 positive. Although donors may not have experienced COVID-19-related symptoms, there is a chance of unnoticed cardiovascular effects associated with this disease. Therefore, SARS-CoV-2 donor grafts have been regularly rejected for heart transplantation (HTx) for a long time. We hereby present three consecutive patients receiving grafts from SARS-CoV-2 positive donors (defined by the PCR cycle threshold value < 30). All patients underwent HTx after a previous triple mRNA vaccination (mRNA-BNT162b2 vaccine, Comirnaty) without adverse events and with a regular post-operative course. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and endomyocardial biopsies confirmed excellent graft function without signs of rejection or viral myocarditis. After a mean follow-up of 135 days after HTx, all patients were in good conditions without heart failure, viral myocarditis, or SARS-CoV-2 infection. Thus, we conclude that HTx with SARS-CoV-2 positive donors seems safe and feasible.

Heart transplantation in the era of corona virus disease 2019: Impact of the pandemic on donors, recipients and outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Since March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has tremendously impacted health care all around the globe. We analyzed the impact of the pandemic on donors, recipients, and outcome of heart transplantation (HTx). METHODS: Between 2010 and early 2022, a total of n = 235 patients underwent HTx in our department. Patients were assigned to the study groups regarding the date of the performed HTx. Group 1 (09/2010 to 02/2020): n = 160, Group 2 (03/2020 to 02/2022): n = 75. RESULTS: Since the pandemic, the etiology of heart failure in the recipients has shifted from dilated (Group 1: 53.8%, Group 2: 32.0%) to ischemic cardiomyopathy (Group 1: 39.4%, Group 2: 50.7%, p < .01). The percentage of high urgency status of the recipients dropped from 50.0% to 36.0% (p = .05), and the use of left ventricular assist (LVAD) support from 56.9% to just 37.3% (p < .01). Meanwhile, the waiting time for the recipients also decreased by about 40% (p = .05). Since the pandemic, donors were 2- times more likely to have been previously resuscitated (Group 1: 21.3%, Group 2: 45.3% (p < .01), and drug abuse increased by more than 3-times (p < .01), indicating acceptance of more marginal donors. Surprisingly, the incidence of postoperative severe primary graft dysfunction requiring extracorporeal life support decreased from 33.1% to 19.4% (p = .04) since the pandemic. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic affected both donors and recipients of HTX but not the postoperative outcome. Donors nowadays are more likely to suffer from ischemic heart disease and are less likely to be on the high-urgency waitlist and on LVAD support. Simultaneously, an increasing number of marginal donors are accepted, leading to shorter waiting times.

In-hospital and 6-month outcomes in patients with COVID-19 supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (EuroECMO-COVID): a multicentre, prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been widely used in patients with COVID-19, but uncertainty remains about the determinants of in-hospital mortality and data on post-discharge outcomes are scarce. The aims of this study were to investigate the variables associated with in-hospital outcomes in patients who received ECMO during the first wave of COVID-19 and to describe the status of patients 6 months after ECMO initiation. METHODS: EuroECMO-COVID is a prospective, multicentre, observational study developed by the European Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. This study was based on data from patients aged 16 years or older who received ECMO support for refractory COVID-19 during the first wave of the pandemic-from March 1 to Sept 13, 2020-at 133 centres in 21 countries. In-hospital mortality and mortality 6 months after ECMO initiation were the primary outcomes. Mixed-Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate associations between patient and management-related variables (eg, patient demographics, comorbidities, pre-ECMO status, and ECMO characteristics and complications) and in-hospital deaths. Survival status at 6 months was established through patient contact or institutional charts review. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04366921, and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between March 1 and Sept 13, 2020, 1215 patients (942 [78%] men and 267 [22%] women; median age 53 years [IQR 46-60]) were included in the study. Median ECMO duration was 15 days (IQR 8-27). 602 (50%) of 1215 patients died in hospital, and 852 (74%) patients had at least one complication. Multiorgan failure was the leading cause of death (192 [36%] of 528 patients who died with available data). In mixed-Cox analyses, age of 60 years or older, use of inotropes and vasopressors before ECMO initiation, chronic renal failure, and time from intubation to ECMO initiation of 4 days or more were associated with higher in-hospital mortality. 613 patients did not die in hospital, and 547 (95%) of 577 patients for whom data were available were alive at 6 months. 102 (24%) of 431 patients had returned to full-time work at 6 months, and 57 (13%) of 428 patients had returned to part-time work. At 6 months, respiratory rehabilitation was required in 88 (17%) of 522 patients with available data, and the most common residual symptoms included dyspnoea (185 [35%] of 523 patients) and cardiac (52 [10%] of 514 patients) or neurocognitive (66 [13%] of 512 patients) symptoms. INTERPRETATION: Patient's age, timing of cannulation (<4 days vs ≥4 days from intubation), and use of inotropes and vasopressors are essential factors to consider when analysing the outcomes of patients receiving ECMO for COVID-19. Despite post-discharge survival being favourable, persisting long-term symptoms suggest that dedicated post-ECMO follow-up programmes are required. FUNDING: None.

Auswirkungen der COVID-19-Pandemie auf die Herzchirurgie Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac surgery

Seit Anfang des Jahres 2020 die COVID-19-Pandemie weltweit das Leben massiv beeinflusst und auch verändert hat, lassen sich naturgemäß gerade im Gesundheitssektor schwerwiegende Konsequenzen beobachten. Diese betreffen Patienten in gleichem Maß wie medizinisches Personal aller Berufsgruppen, sowohl im ambulanten als auch im stationären Bereich. Die Herzchirurgie als eine Disziplin, die wie keine zweite von der vorhandenen Kapazität auf Intensivstationen abhängig ist, war erwartungsgemäß von den Auswirkungen der Pandemie schwer betroffen. Dieser Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über die Konsequenzen für die klinische Versorgung, die Forschung und die Lehre sowie für die herzchirurgische Weiterbildung

[ECMO support during the first two waves of the corona pandemic-a survey of high case volume centers in Germany]. / ECMO-Unterstützung während der ersten 2 Wellen der Coronapandemie ­ eine Umfrage an Zentren mit hohen Fallzahlen in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: At the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, concerns were raised about sufficiency of available intensive care resources. In many places, routine interventions were postponed and criteria for the allocation of scarce resources were formulated. In Germany, some hospitals were at times seriously burdened during the course of the pandemic. Intensive care units in particular experienced a shortage of resources, which may have led to a restriction of services and a stricter indication setting for resource-intensive measures such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The aim of this work is to provide an overview of how these pressures were managed at large ECMO centers in Germany. METHODS: One representative of each major ECMO referral center in Germany was invited to participate in an online survey in spring 2021. RESULTS: Of 34 invitations that were sent out, the survey was answered by 23 participants. In all centers, routine procedures were postponed during the pandemic. Half of the centers increased the number of beds on which ECMO procedures could be offered. Nevertheless, in one-third of the centers, the start of at least one ECMO support was delayed because of a feared resource shortage. In 17% of centers, at least one patient was denied ECMO that he or she would have most likely received under prepandemic conditions. CONCLUSION: The results of this online survey indicate that the experienced pressures and resource constraints led some centers to be cautious about ECMO indications.

Third dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine in cardiothoracic transplant recipients: predictive factors for humoral response.

BACKGROUND: We report the results of a prospective study on the immunogenicity of a 3rd dose of BNT162b2 in thoracic organ recipients with no or minimal response following a two-dose BNT162b2 vaccination scheme. METHODS: A total of 243 transplant recipients received a homologue 3rd dose. Anti-SARS-CoV2-immunoglobulins (IgGs) were monitored immediately before (T1), 4 weeks (T2) as well as 2 and 4 months after the 3rd dose. Neutralizing antibody capacity (NAC) was determined at T2. To reveal predictors for detectable humoral response, patients were divided into a positive response group (n = 129) based on the combined criteria of IgGs and NAC above the defined cut-offs at T2-and a group with negative response (n = 114), with both, IgGs and NAC beyond the cut-offs. RESULTS: The 3rd dose induced a positive humoral response in 53% of patients at T2, 47% were still non-responsive. Sero-positivity was significantly stronger in patients who presented with weak, but detectable IgGs already prior to the booster (T1), when compared to those with no detectable response at T1. Multivariable analysis identified age > 55 years, a period since transplantation < 2 years, a reduced glomerular filtration rate, a triple immunosuppressive regimen, and the use of tacrolimus and of mycophenolate as independent risk factors for lack of humoral response. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that a lack of immunogenicity is linked to the type and extent of maintenance immunosuppression. The necessity of the cumulative immunosuppressive regimen might individually be questioned and possibly be reduced to enhance the chance of an immune response following an additional booster dose.

COVID-19 nach Herztransplantation: Erfahrungen eines deutschen Transplantationszentrums COVID-19 after heart transplantation: experiences from a German transplantation center

Hintergrund Die durch SARS-CoV‑2 (Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2) verursachte Erkrankung gilt bei immunsupprimierten Patienten als besonders gefährlich. Patienten nach einer Herztransplantation zählen zu den Gruppen mit langjähriger, meist 3‑facher Immunsuppression. In der Literatur werden schwerwiegende klinische Verläufe beschrieben. Ziel der Arbeit (Fragestellung) In dieser Arbeit wird über unsere Erfahrungen mit COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) bei herztransplantierten Patienten an einem deutschen Transplantationszentrum longitudinal über die bisherigen Pandemiewellen berichtet und es erfolgt eine Einordnung dieser in publizierte Erfahrungen anderer Zentren. Material und Methoden Alle adulten herztransplantierten Patienten unseres Zentrums, bei denen nach der Herztransplantation eine SARS-CoV-2-Infektion nachgewiesen wurde (n = 12), wurden eingeschlossen und retrospektiv analysiert. Ergebnisse Das Durchschnittsalter betrug 61,5 (49 bis 63) Jahre;die Mehrheit der Patienten war männlich (83 %). Die häufigsten Komorbiditäten waren Diabetes (42 %), arterielle Hypertonie (43 %) sowie chronische Niereninsuffizienz (67 %). Bei 50 % erfolgte bei Krankenhausaufnahme eine passive Immunisierung (Rekonvaleszenzplasma/monoklonale Antikörper). Eine Sauerstoffgabe war bei 33 % der Patienten notwendig;nur ein Patient erhielt eine nichtinvasive Ventilation (8 %). Kein Patient benötigte eine invasive Beatmung oder eine mechanische Herz-Kreislauf-Unterstützung (ECMO). Es fanden sich keine neuen kardiovaskulären oder thrombembolischen Ereignisse. Zusammenfassung In dieser Kohorte konnten wir longitudinal keine schweren Verläufe oder eine erhöhte Mortalität von COVID-19 in herztransplantierten Patienten detektieren. Prospektive Studien sind notwendig, um in Zukunft bessere Prognoseabschätzungen bei COVID-19 in (herz-)transplantierten Patienten treffen zu können.

Venovenöse extrakorporale Membranoxygenierung bei COVID-19 : Erkenntnisse eines Zentrums aus 96 konsekutiven Fällen Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19Findings of a centre from 96 consecutive cases

Hintergrund Seit Beginn der COVID-19-Pandemie werden die globalen Gesundheitssysteme vor eine Vielzahl neuartiger Probleme gestellt. Die venovenöse extrakorporale Membranoxygenierung (vv-ECMO) stellt bei Krankheitsverläufen mit therapierefraktärem ARDS häufig eine Ultima Ratio der Therapie dar. Für eine verbesserte medizinische Versorgung ist es notwendig, potenzielle Einflussfaktoren auf den Therapieerfolg zu identifizieren. Fragestellung In dieser Arbeit sollen die Erkenntnisse eines ECMO Zentrums vorgestellt werden. Insbesondere interessierte die Frage, durch welche Faktoren das Therapieergebnis einer vv-ECMO-Therapie von COVID-19-Patienten beeinflusst wird. Material und Methoden In der Zeit zwischen März 2020 und Dezember 2021 wurden insgesamt n = 96 Patienten in unserem Zentrum mit einer vv-ECMO aufgrund eines ARDS bei COVID-19 behandelt. Es erfolgte eine retrospektive Auswertung der demografischen und gesundheitsspezifischen Faktoren. Hierbei wurden Patienten mit letalem Therapieausgang (L-Gruppe, n = 62) sowie die Überlebenden (Ü-Gruppe, n = 34) miteinander verglichen. Ergebnisse Insgesamt überlebten n = 34 (35 %) der Patienten den Krankenhausaufenthalt. Die verstorbenen Patienten hatten ein mittleres Alter von 56,7 ± 9,5 Jahren, verglichen mit 47,9 ± 12,9 Jahren bei den Überlebenden. Unter den behandelten Patienten befanden sich n = 72 (75 %) männliche und n = 24 (25 %) weibliche Patienten. In der Gruppe der verstorbenen Patienten waren n = 51 (82,3 %) Männer sowie n = 11 (17,7 %) Frauen (p = 0,047). Die Prävalenz von Vorerkrankungen wie COPD, Diabetes mellitus, Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen sowie chronischer Niereninsuffizienz zeigte keinerlei Unterschiede zwischen den beiden Gruppen. Auch in Bezug auf das Vorliegen von arterieller Hypertonie und Adipositas konnte kein signifikanter Trend für einen negativen Therapieeinfluss nachgewiesen werden. Es zeigte sich für Patienten mit einem Nikotinabusus in der Anamnese jedoch eine negative Tendenz. Die häufigsten Gründe für ein Versterben waren respiratorische Insuffizienz, neurologische Insulte, Multiorganversagen und Sepsis. Diskussion Der Einsatz einer vv-ECMO bei therapierefraktärem ARDS im Rahmen einer COVID-19-Erkrankung geht weiterhin mit einer hohen Sterblichkeit einher und ist somit nur als Ultima Ratio in Betracht zu ziehen. In unserem Patientenkollektiv konnten wir erwartungsgemäß bessere Ergebnisse bei jüngeren Patienten beobachten, jedoch auch bei Frauen. Für die meisten Begleiterkrankungen konnten wir bis dato keinen negativen Einfluss auf das Therapieergebnis nachweisen. Diese Erkenntnisse könnten helfen, zukünftige Risikopatienten zu identifizieren.

COVID-19 pandemic deteriorates aftercare attendance in heart transplant recipients independently of perceived impact on social life.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplant (HTx) recipients are at an increased risk of developing infections or malignancies due to immunosuppressive medication. Thus, regular aftercare in those patients is of utmost importance. The extent of collateral damage due to the COVID-19 pandemic (delayed or canceled clinical visits and diagnostics) on high-risk patients is yet unknown. We believe that, especially for HTx-patients, data acquisition on potential pandemic-related nonattendance is crucial to improve clinical care in the future. Therefore, we aim to decipher possible COVID-19-related alterations in attendance to clinical care after HTx using a survey-based approach. METHODS: HTx recipients, 2 years beyond transplantation were selected (n = 75). We filed a paper-based questionnaire or an online survey containing nine items about COVID-19-related exceptional circumstances. Fifty-two patients (69%) returned fully answered questionnaires. RESULTS: A perceived impact on daily life was evident with 79% of all patients, reporting a moderate-to-severe negative influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on daily routine. We detected increased nonattendance of clinical care during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to prepandemic time (38 vs. 6%, p < .0001). The various diagnostic modalities of aftercare were heterogeneously affected, ranging from 2% nonattendance for influence vaccination and 18% for colonoscopy. Off note, nonattendance to clinical care within the pandemic was independent of perceived impact of the pandemia on daily life (p > .68). CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, we objectively demonstrate a significant decrease in attendance to clinical care in HTx recipients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Efforts are needed to increase attendance in this highly vulnerable patient cohort.

Adequate immune response after SARS-CoV-2 infection and single dose vaccination despite rapid heart transplantation.

Adequate immune response to vaccination remains a challenge in patients after solid organ transplantation. We report a case of a 61-year-old male patient who received a left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplant therapy. Three months before transplantation, he suffered mild SARS-CoV-2 infection and was successfully discharged thereafter. Eight days before his successful heart transplantation, he received mRNA BNT 162b2 vaccination. Immediately after transplantation, we detected sufficient rise of nucleocapsid and spike antibodies despite immune suppression therapy. We suspect potential booster effects of the previous SARS-CoV-2 infection giving rise to adequate immune response following single vaccination.

Poor humoral and T-cell response to two-dose SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA vaccine BNT162b2 in cardiothoracic transplant recipients.

AIMS: Immunocompromised patients have been excluded from studies of SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA vaccines. The immune response to vaccines against other infectious agents has been shown to be blunted in such patients. We aimed to analyse the humoral and cellular response to prime-boost vaccination with the BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) in cardiothoracic transplant recipients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 50 transplant patients [1-3 years post heart (42), lung (7), or heart-lung (1) transplant, mean age 55 ± 10 years] and a control group of 50 healthy staff members were included. Blood samples were analysed 21 days after the prime and the boosting dose, respectively, to quantify anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S) immunoglobulin titres (tested by Abbott, Euroimmun and RocheElecsys Immunoassays, each) and the functional inhibitory capacity of neutralizing antibodies (Genscript). To test for a specific T-cell response, heparinized whole blood was stimulated with SARS-CoV-2 specific peptides, covering domains of the viral spike, nucleocapsid and membrane protein, and the interferon-γ release was measured (QuantiFERON Monitor ELISA, Qiagen). The vast majority of transplant patients (90%) showed neither a detectable humoral nor a T-cell response three weeks after the completed two-dose BNT162b2 vaccination; these results are in sharp contrast to the robust immunogenicity seen in the control group: 98% exhibited seroconversion after the prime dose already, with a further significant increase of IgG titres after the booster dose (average > tenfold increase), a more than 90% inhibition capability of neutralizing antibodies as well as evidence of a T-cell responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of poor immune responses to a two-dose BNT162b2 vaccination in cardiothoracic transplant patients have a significant impact for organ transplant recipients specifically and possibly for immunocompromised patients in general. It urges for a review of future vaccine strategies in these patients.

Moderate acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination in patients pre- and post-heart transplantation: Experiences from a German Transplant Centre.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Patients awaiting heart transplantation (HTx) are at increased risk developing severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Patients supported by a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) face additional risks due to coagulopathies during COVID-19. Following HTx, elevated risk factors for severe COVID-19 persist due to chronic immunosuppression and frequent comorbidities. Taken together, COVID-19 vaccination is of critical importance in all three patient cohorts. Here, we report our experience to deliver COVID-19 vaccination in a German transplant center. METHODS AND RESULTS: We screened 211 patients for contraindications and offered the remaining 186 eligible patients COVID-19 vaccination. Of those, 133 patients (71%) accepted the offer and were vaccinated. Acceptance of vaccination differed between HTx recipients (84 of 113, 74%), patients on the waiting list (34 of 47, 72%), and patients with LVAD support (28 of 50, 56%). The LVAD cohort demonstrated lower acceptance levels for vaccination compared to HTx recipients and patients awaiting HTx (74% vs. 56%; p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: We demonstrate for the first time only moderate acceptance levels of COVID-19 vaccination in HTx recipients and candidates on the waiting list compared to general population, despite perceived high-risk for severe disease. Additionally, those supported by LVAD have even lower adherence. Efforts may need to be made to increase acceptance in this vulnerable as well as cost-intensive patient cohort.

Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Coronavirus Disease 2019 Interim Guidelines: A Consensus Document from an International Group of Interdisciplinary Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Providers.

Disclaimer: The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Guidelines have been developed to assist existing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) centers to prepare and plan provision of ECMO during the ongoing pandemic. The recommendations have been put together by a team of interdisciplinary ECMO providers from around the world. Recommendations are based on available evidence, existing best practice guidelines, ethical principles, and expert opinion. This is a living document and will be regularly updated when new information becomes available. ELSO is not liable for the accuracy or completeness of the information in this document. These guidelines are not meant to replace sound clinical judgment or specialist consultation but rather to strengthen provision and clinical management of ECMO specifically, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

COVID-19 among heart transplant recipients in Germany: a multicenter survey.

AIMS: Heart transplantation may represent a particular risk factor for severe coronavirus infectious disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to chronic immunosuppression and frequent comorbidities. We conducted a nation-wide survey of all heart transplant centers in Germany presenting the clinical characteristics of heart transplant recipients with COVID-19 during the first months of the pandemic in Germany. METHODS AND RESULTS: A multicenter survey of all heart transplant centers in Germany evaluating the current status of COVID-19 among adult heart transplant recipients was performed. A total of 21 heart transplant patients with COVID-19 was reported to the transplant centers during the first months of the pandemic in Germany. Mean patient age was 58.6 ± 12.3 years and 81.0% were male. Comorbidities included arterial hypertension (71.4%), dyslipidemia (71.4%), diabetes mellitus (33.3%), chronic kidney failure requiring dialysis (28.6%) and chronic-obstructive lung disease/asthma (19.0%). Most patients received an immunosuppressive drug regimen consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor (71.4%), mycophenolate mofetil (85.7%) and steroids (71.4%). Eight of 21 patients (38.1%) displayed a severe course needing invasive mechanical ventilation. Those patients showed a high mortality (87.5%) which was associated with right ventricular dysfunction (62.5% vs. 7.7%; p = 0.014), arrhythmias (50.0% vs. none; p = 0.012), and thromboembolic events (50.0% vs. none; p = 0.012). Elevated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T- and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide were significantly associated with the severe form of COVID-19 (p = 0.017 and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Severe course of COVID-19 was frequent in heart transplanted patients. High mortality was associated with right ventricular dysfunction, arrhythmias, thromboembolic events, and markedly elevated cardiac biomarkers.